by Liza Farachdel
Three weeks away from the elections, and I haven’t a clue yet as to who will get my vote. First of all, given the recent game of musical parties (similar to musical chairs, except that when the music stops, you’ve got to join whichever party you happen to be closest to; strangely, the maturity level of the players is very similar to the maturity level of those who play the actual musical chairs game), I can’t keep track of which politicians are in which parties.
With politicians switching alliances more frequently than I change clothes (does that say more about them or more about me? Never mind, don’t answer that…), it’s impossible to know what any of them truly believe, which, unsurprisingly, directly affects my ability to actually believe anything they say.
What makes these elections more interesting, though, are the repercussions that recent Palestinian elections will have on the various party platforms. Parties that previously advocated peace talks as a primary feature on their agenda are being forced to search for different issues on which to focus, given that negotiating with Hamas is not really seen as a big vote-getter these days. As such, security continues to be an important issue, especially now that an organization advocating Israel’s destruction has become the major player in the Palestinian political scene. Welfare and economic issues are also featuring prominently, with each of the main parties scrambling to get its message across that only their party can save the economy and the country.
Much welcomed and long overdue, the current head of the Labor party is Amir Peretz, an Israeli of Moroccan descent who grew up in a Southern development town. It’s the first time that an individual with a background such as this has held the leadership of what has traditionally been considered one of the elitist Ashkenazi parties, so it is truly wonderful to see that another barrier has been broken. Whether or not an individual who has never so much as held a cabinet position is capable of leading the government is debatable – other politicians who found themselves in a similar position – albeit with at least minimal ministerial experience – failed miserably. The fact that he facilitated change and more than left his mark as chairman of the Histadrut is certainly a point in his favor (though I’d be lying if I said that he didn’t wreak havoc on my life more than once with his tendency towards striking the entire public sector on numerous occasions), but running the Histadrut is not like running the country, and quite frankly, I’m not sure he’s up to snuff.
Of course, chances are slim that Mr. Peretz will get to lead the country anyway, as it seems the victory has already been sewn up by the Kadima party, led by Ehud Olmert. I see the Kadima party as something of a phenomenon, sort of like Ariel Sharon’s joke on everyone. As the public knows, Mr. Sharon went against his former party (and more than a handful of those citizens who voted for him) by executing last summer’s disengagement. Members of the Likud tried to destroy him politically, but he beat them to the punch by leaving and forming a new party, almost bringing Likud to the brink of disintegration. While Kadima was trying to figure itself out, Mr. Sharon became incapacitated, leaving this motley crew without its unifying force. Suddenly, the Israeli political scene became the best reality show in town, everyone glued to their media of choice, waiting to discover how things would turn out. It just doesn’t get any more exciting than this, folks!
But I digress. The Kadima party. What started out as an assortment of disgruntled, opportunistic politicians without a cohesive vision has slowly turned into… well, what has it turned into, really? Their current platform seems to be, “follow in Sharon’s footsteps, bring up his name at every opportunity, and try not to make wavesâ€. This last bit blew up in their faces earlier this week, however, when Omri Sharon’s personal diaries surfaced in a scathing report on Israel’s Channel 10 news, showing the lengths to which he’d gone in order to shore up support for his father several years back, with all sorts of political appointments and deals. This alone is not terribly encouraging, and it certainly doesn’t help matters that Mr. Olmert’s name was mentioned on more than one occasion in conjunction with said appointments and deals. It should be interesting to see if this little scandal affects Kadima at the polls, though I’m not holding my breath.
The best thing to come out of all the political posturing is the plethora of young, new faces in many of the parties. Unfortunately for Ariel Sharon, it seems that his actions and subsequent illness may have brought about the cataclysmic shake-up that was needed. Out with the old guard and in with the new, and here’s hoping that it is a change for the better. Now that prospects for peace have been unexpectedly pushed to the back burner, let’s hope that the long period of stagnation in Israeli politics is over, and the incoming Knesset freshmen will indeed focus their energies on strengthening all sectors of Israeli society, instead of only strengthening themselves.
March 11, 2006 at 1:58 am
Liza, It all sounds so sad. Not to mention impossible to figure out! At one point I really thought I had it figured out. When I saw the heart of that warrior (Ariel Sharon) so desirous of peace, and those people in the Gaza Stip making such sacrifice for the sake of peace, I just knew that was the long awaited “wake-up call” Isreal so needed to send the rest of the nations. And that out of all the nations, all those who love Isreal would come to her aid-financially, prayerfully and in whatever other capacity they could. One thing I know for sure, the world is watching as never before! Let’s just hope they don’t “hit the snooze”! Love and prayers to Israel!
March 13, 2006 at 3:29 am
Far be it that you should listen to me, only an American, but one with your best interests at heart. Does not Hamas need one to leash them and bind them and train them (or end their thievery and murders) before they can wipe your ingratiating smiles from your welcoming faces? Do you not have a David or a Joshua or a Gideon who can stand against the rabble who desire to destroy you? Does not Binyamin Netanyahu still walk among you? Is not the hand of Bibi eager to leave the plow and seize the sword?
March 13, 2006 at 8:43 am
i feel compelled to coment, having re-read.
The business with the press looking for every opprtunity to “expose” both Arik and Omri Sharon for political wheeling and dealing, is, in my eyes, ludicrous. Politics is ALL about wheeling and dealing. That we hear about an instance of manipulation and politicking in a back room or two, and are supposed to be outraged is nothing short of stupid, or at the very least naive and gullible.
Power is an enticing prize. People will misbehave in order to obtain it. If we believe any politician is taint-free, we are doing our intelligence a disservice.
Just my two shekelsworth.
March 18, 2006 at 3:19 pm
As a post modern American, I was delighted by your “Election Fever” article. You will have enough comments about the political substance of the piece. I would like to talk a little about style. I absolutely adored your personal, quasi-linear style of exposition. As I read it, I began to look forward as much to a forthcoming parenthetical remark and to self-awareness comments (that others might consider a distraction or intrusion … as I illustrate in this parenthetical remark ) as I did to the honest and tentative quality of your analysis. Bravo and hatzlachah.
March 20, 2006 at 9:59 pm
Olmert is Abbas’s choice. Olmert helped Omri Sharon break election laws, which is minor compared to the comfort Olmert gives to Hamas. He helped destroy the lives of thousands in Gush Katif. Such traitorous behavior is worthy of jail, not a position of leadership.