The al-Khaleej newspaper’s got the scoop! Iranian dictator Mahmoud Ahmadinejad will soon be visiting Lebanese dictator, Saad Hariri to discuss
“Iran’s ownership of what he regards as the struggle of the Muslim world against Israel.”
As Jerusalem Post’s Jonathan Spyer worded it.
Will he visit the Southern border with Israel? Does the Iranian leader have the chutzpa?
Spyer observed that the visit could be a signal that the Republic of Lebanon is making a de facto initiation into the “axis of evil,” to borrow a phrase from the Bush-era.
Iran wishes to make itself the crux authority in the region, despite its non-Sunni and non-Arab population. Of course Abbas’ Western diplomacy and recent reception of $400 million from the World Bank only has the Iranian leader salivating more to make his proxy weapon, Hezbollah, more of a bona fide sovereignty in the region â€“ and thereby lifts Iran to an even more authoritative position through the world over.
As a result of Iran’s weight, the good citizens of Lebanon have not stood a chance to build a state which is respectable and buoyant at-best since their 2005 withdrawal from Syria.
Restrictions on banking services and shipping are reducing Iranâ€™s ability to sell the crude oil which is critical to its economy; a result of the country’s nuclear policy. Yet Ahmadinejad refuses to cite any other root cause than the Jewish Country for its woes.
And speaking of which, Iran lost a possible medal and many points in the 2010 World Wrestling Championships in Moscow, this month, when the Greco-Roman wrestler Taleb Nematpour refused to compete against his Israeli rival for the championship match.
Supposedly, Miresmaeili withdrew because he exceeded the weight limit â€“ however, he was quoted on his return home saying he had
“avoided the match as a sign of sympathy with the people of Palestine.”
Wrote Foreign Correspondent, Maryam Sinaiee of the Abu Dhabi news source, The National.
If that were the case, why not stay and fight? I don’t know â€“ call it Jihad or something! Pin the Jew and cry, “Free Palestine!”
Nematpour had won the 2010 FÃ©dÃ©ration Internationale des Luttes AssociÃ©es Golden Prix Finals and was also a 2010 World Cup bronze medalist.
Iran reported that he withdrew due to â€œsevere appendix pains.â€ Though Esmail Kowsari, a legislator and staunch opponent of any direct competition with Israelis, claims that:
“Such justifications â€“ made to international athletic federations and committees to avoid penalties â€“ are unnecessary and athletes should be proud of withdrawing.”
â€œI say our athletes shouldnâ€™t even use illness as an excuse for their honourable deedâ€¦We have repeatedly announced that we donâ€™t recognize Israel.â€
Ever since the Islamic Revolution of 1979, Iranian athletes have refused to compete against Israeli athletes in international sporting events.
â€œThis was worth a hundred medals,â€ said Iranâ€™s supreme leader, Ayatollah Khamenei to Arash Miresmaeili after the judo champion refused to fight Israeli Ehud Vaks in the 2004 Athens Olympic Games.
A political analyst in Tehran, who insists to remain anonymous said:
â€œIranian and Israeli athletic performance has significantly improved since 1983 and resulted in more frequent chances of their confrontation in international athletic competitionâ€¦It has also become more difficult for the Iranian athletes and authorities to justify absence from competitions to Olympics committees and international athletic federations. The denial of the consideration of lifting the ban shows that the dilemma of facing the Israeli athletes or not facing them and bearing the consequences will not be resolved any time soonâ€¦”
In July, Iran was accused of putting politics before sports at the Youth Olympics because of its withdrawal from a taekwondo final against the Jewish Country â€“ known to be talented in the Martial Arts.
Anyway, now-a-days, any conflict which is beyond resolution by cathartic sportsmanship is very much a risk to world peace!
Get in the ring guys!
September 20, 2010 at 2:35 pm
In order to thoughtfully assess Iranian policy, we must understand their culture. Iranians expect a ruler to demonstrate resolve and strength, and do whatever it takes
to remain in power. The Western concept of demanding that a leader subscribe to a moral and ethical code does not resonate with Iranians. Policymakers would be wise to understand that telling Iranians that their ruler is cruel will not convince the public that they need a new leader. To the contrary,
this will reinforce the idea that their ruler is strong. It is only when Iranians become convinced that either their rulers lack the resolve to do what is necessary to remain in power or that a stronger power will protect them against their current tyrannical rulers, that they will speak out and try to overthrow leaders.
Read a full analysis: http://www.jcpa.org/text/iranian_behavior.pdf